/cards/ once it crosses the publish bar. Status: superseded. Supersedes version 25.CL-STA-0954 chained FortiJump and KEV-listed CVE-2025-61624 to deploy PEERSTITCH on FortiGates
Unit 42 reports that CL-STA-0954 (UNC5820) breached a telecom MSP's FortiManager via CVE-2024-47575, then used CVE-2025-61624 to inject PEERSTITCH into miglogd and iked on managed FortiGates [S1]. CISA lists CVE-2025-61624 as exploited [S3][S4]. Today: capture evidence before rebooting, run the four hunts, rotate secrets held in device configs, and apply FG-IR-26-122 or its virtual patch [S6].
Triage: CVE-2025-61624 is KEV-listed as exploited [S3][S4], and one FortiManager compromise exposed configs and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates [S1].
Unit 42 primary research describes the intrusion in detail [S1], and CISA confirms CVE-2025-61624 exploitation via KEV [S3][S4]. The CISA sources do not themselves link the CVE to PEERSTITCH, and SecurityWeek's page could not be read [S2].
Changed since version 25
- Renumbered sources to this input: Unit 42 is now S1 (previously cited as S6 without a source entry), SecurityWeek S2, CISA KEV S3, CISA alert S4, The Hacker News S5, FortiGuard S6; all references remapped [S1-S6].
- Added Unit 42 as a listed source; Unit 42 details now cite S1 directly [S1].
- Confidence set to high on Unit 42 primary research plus CISA KEV [S1][S3][S4].
- Verify: added daemon text-patch check at the three published offsets and noted nine published SHA-256 hashes [S1].
- Verify: added benign look-alikes.
- Hunt 2 hit_means now notes pM.js served from 47.18.167.159:8085 as well [S1].
- Contain: consolidated the four campaign IPs under S1 [S1].
- Added eradicate steps, timeline, re-entry triggers and coverage checks [S1][S2][S4][S5][S6].
- Open questions: added story-date inconsistency and an unsourced NGFW guidance item.
What happened
- CL-STA-0954 exploited FortiJump (CVE-2024-47575) on a telecom MSP's FortiManager and registered a rogue Virtual FortiGate named localhost (serial FMG-VMTM23017412) [S1].
- The actor generated a .tm config archive and took configs, credentials and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates [S1].
- The actor pushed sniffer configs to managed FortiGates and opened SSL-VPN sessions with cracked credentials from staging infrastructure [S1].
- The actor used auto-script path traversal (CVE-2025-61624) to gain root and fetch five files from 23.240.77.233:8085 into /data2/template/ [S1].
- PEERSTITCH ptrace-injects into /bin/miglogd and /bin/iked to bypass validation on tagged VPN sessions. An Apache mod_md ACME job spawns SSH reverse shells [S1].
- CISA added CVE-2025-61624 to KEV on 2026-10-16 based on evidence of active exploitation [S3][S4].
Timeline
| 2026-10-15 | Unit 42 publishes PEERSTITCH research on CL-STA-0954 / FortiJump intrusion S1 |
| 2026-10-16 | The Hacker News reports the campaign, citing FortiGuard FG-IR-26-122 S5 |
| 2026-10-16 | CISA adds CVE-2025-61624 to KEV S4 |
| 2026-10-20 | SecurityWeek covers the campaign; linked page content could not be read S2 |
Detect
FortiGate auto-script objects with path traversal names · FortiOS system event / config change logs (syslog or FortiAnalyzer forward)
index=* devid=* type="event" subtype="system" (cfgpath="system.auto-script" OR msg="*auto-script*") (cfgobj="*../*" OR msg="*../*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(action) as action values(cfgobj) as cfgobj values(msg) as msg by devname user ui
A hit means: An auto-script object with ../ in its name was created, edited or deleted. Unit 42 names ../../../../setup and ../../tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf [S1]. Treat a hit as likely compromise. The actor deletes auto-scripts after use, so a delete event alone matters [S1].
Traffic, web or SSL-VPN sessions involving campaign infrastructure · FortiGate traffic, web filter and VPN event logs; proxy/egress logs
index=* (srcip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR dstip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR remip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR url="*/pM.js" OR (dstport=8085 (url="*/a.js" OR url="*/a.wasm" OR url="*/b.js" OR url="*/dd")) OR (dstport=8084 (url="*/acme/*" OR url="*/directory")) OR url="*/acme/new-acct*" OR url="*/acme/finalize/*" OR url="*/acme/order/*" OR url="*/acme/authz/*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(dstport) as dstport values(url) as url values(action) as action values(user) as user by devname srcip dstipA hit means: A device contacted campaign infrastructure. A fetch of pM.js, a.js, a.wasm, b.js or dd from port 8085 (23.240.77.233 or 47.18.167.159) matches the component download [S1]. Port 8084 /directory and /acme/ paths match the mod_md SSH reverse-shell channel [S1]. Inbound SSL-VPN logins from these IPs match stolen-credential use [S1]. ACME paths alone can be benign if the peer is not a campaign IP.
Logging daemons killed, crashlogs cleared, or FortiGateCloud admin activity · FortiOS CLI audit and system event logs
index=* devid=* (msg="*killall*miglogd*" OR msg="*killall*syslogd*" OR msg="*crashlog clear*" OR user="FortiGateCloud") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg values(ui) as ui by devname user
A hit means: Someone stopped logging or cleared crash logs, matching the actor's log tampering [S1]. An admin named FortiGateCloud pulling running configs over FGFM matches the FortiManager impersonation [S1]. Also check each device's syslog stream for gaps; a successful kill produces silence, not events.
Rogue Virtual FortiGate registration on FortiManager · FortiManager event / device management logs
index=* ("FMG-VMTM23017412" OR ("Virtual FortiGate" AND "localhost") OR ".tm") devid=* | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg by devnameA hit means: The rogue Virtual FortiGate (localhost, serial FMG-VMTM23017412) appears, or a .tm archive is referenced [S1]. Treat the FortiManager and every device it manages as in scope. Absence does not clear you; the actor may use other serials. The bare .tm term is noisy, so confirm by context.
Verify
- Pull config revisions on each FortiGate. Look for auto-script objects containing ../ and for admins or VPN groups created and then deleted [S1].
- Run diagnose debug crashlog read. Signal 11 crashes in miglogd, iked or syslogd are a reported indicator [S1].
- pM.js deletes itself, so its absence does not clear a device [S1]. Check /data2/template/ for leftover lldprx, ipssem.js, index.js and index.wasm [S1].
- Hash recovered files against Unit 42's published SHA-256 values (nine listed) and scan with YARA rule u42_apt_linux_PEERSTITCH_fortigate_implant [S1].
- Inspect Apache mod_md job.json for MDChallengeDns01 mapped to /bin/node, and SSH arguments such as kali@23.240.77.233:8084 with -F /tmp/upfile/ssh_config [S1].
- Check /proc/<pid>/maps of /bin/miglogd and /bin/iked for anonymous 16,384-byte rwxp regions, and audit /proc/<pid>/mem writes between them [S1].
Scope
Affected
- FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager (CVE-2025-61624) [S3][S4]
- FortiManager (CVE-2024-47575), the initial access in this campaign [S1]
- FortiGates managed by a compromised FortiManager, whose configs and keys were exfiltrated [S1]
Only if
- CVE-2025-61624 requires an authenticated attacker with an admin profile that has read-write permissions, who can then write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands [S3][S4].
- In this campaign, that access followed credentials and keys taken via the compromised FortiManager [S1].
Not affected if
None stated by the sources.
Fixed in: See Fortinet FG-IR-26-122 [S6]. The provided material does not state fixed versions.
Enumerate
- List every FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, FortiSwitchManager and FortiManager instance, with its running version.
- For each FortiManager, list registered devices, unknown Virtual FortiGates, .tm archives, and the FortiGates it manages [S1].
- List all admin accounts, VPN users and groups, including deleted ones visible in config revisions [S1].
- List sniffer configs on FortiGates, especially those capturing TCP 3696-3706, UDP 69, 1812/1813 or TCP 389 [S1].
- List secrets stored in FortiGate configs: admin and VPN credentials, pre-shared keys, certificates, and RADIUS/LDAP binds [S1].
- Map management and FGFM (TCP 541) exposure per device, and the hosts each FortiGate accepts management connections from [S1].
Contain
- Before patching or rebooting, export config revisions, event logs and crash logs. With vendor support, capture memory of miglogd and iked, where PEERSTITCH runs [S1]. A reboot destroys in-memory artifacts and cannot be undone.
- Block 23.240.77.233, 47.18.167.159, 45.32.41.202 and 198.199.122.22 at egress and for SSL-VPN [S1].
- Block outbound SSH from firewall management addresses unless required. The actor used mod_md to spawn SSH reverse shells [S1].
- Restrict management and FGFM access to known FortiManager and admin hosts. Remove internet exposure of FortiManager and admin interfaces.
- Disable unknown admins and VPN accounts. Remove unauthorized sniffer configs and rogue FortiManager device registrations [S1].
- If a FortiManager may be compromised, rotate every credential and key stored in FortiGate configs [S1]. Rotation does not undo exposure of data already taken.
- Apply FG-IR-26-122 and the FortiManager fix for CVE-2024-47575. Where patching lags, confirm FortiGuard virtual patch FG-VD-59270.0day (FMWP db 25.120) is in place [S6].
Eradicate
- Remove auto-script objects with traversal names, rogue admins, VPN groups and sniffer configs [S1].
- Remove /data2/template/ components (lldprx, ipssem.js, index.js, index.wasm) and the mod_md job.json entry mapping MDChallengeDns01 to /bin/node [S1].
- Clear injected code from miglogd and iked with vendor guidance; the sources do not say whether a reboot alone suffices [S1].
- Close root cause: patch CVE-2024-47575 on FortiManager and CVE-2025-61624 on affected products [S1][S6].
Recover
- Before restoring, confirm patched firmware, a config matching a known-good baseline, and rotated secrets [S6].
- Confirm syslog flows continuously from each device and crash logs are retained [S1].
- Confirm no 16KB rwxp regions remain in miglogd and iked, and that the published YARA rule finds nothing [S1].
- Afterwards, keep the four hunts running. Alert on new auto-scripts, short-lived admins, sniffer config changes, outbound SSH from firewalls, unexpected FGFM peers and logging gaps [S1].
Re-enter the loop when
- Fortinet updates FG-IR-26-122 with fixed versions or new affected products [S6].
- New IoCs, hashes or C2 addresses are published beyond the current set [S1].
- Any hunt hits on a FortiManager: every managed FortiGate enters scope [S1].
- A source confirms or refutes the roles of CVE-2024-26008 or CVE-2024-26009 [S2][S5].
- A source states whether PEERSTITCH survives reboot.
Debrief
- Record each device, version, patch date, evidence captured and hunt results.
- Record which secrets were rotated and when, and any logging gaps found.
- Record VPN sessions that could not be validated, given the iked bypass [S1].
- Gap: the provided material does not state fixed versions.
- Gap: the roles of CVE-2024-26008 and CVE-2024-26009 are unexplained. One story calls CVE-2024-26008 a FortiJump alias, but SecurityWeek's linked content could not be read [S2].
- Gap: the sources do not say whether PEERSTITCH survives a reboot.
Detection coverage — checked automatically
| Category | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Impacted vendor / CERT advisory | published — primary source among the thread's sources: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — not in the catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-47575 | published — listed 2024-10-23, federal due 2024-11-13 |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2025-61624 | published — listed 2026-10-16, federal due 2026-10-19 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-26008 | published — published 2025-10-14, CVSS 3.1 5.3 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-47575 | published — published 2024-10-23, CVSS 3.1 9.8 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2025-61624 | published — published 2026-04-14, CVSS 3.1 6 |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-47575 | published — ThreatPROTECT: CISA Added Fortinet FortiManager Vulnerability to its Known Exploitable Vulnerabilities Catalog (CVE-2024-47575) |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-26008 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-47575 | published — InsightVM coverage stated · 1 Metasploit module (not linked) |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2025-61624 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-26008 | published — 1 plugin: 270402 Fortinet Fortigate FGFM protocol allows unauthenticated reset of the connection (FG-IR-24-041) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 1 plugin: 209559 Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication (FG-IR-24-423) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2025-61624 | published — 1 plugin: 306463 Fortinet Fortigate Path Traversal in CLI (FG-IR-26-122) |
| EDR / endpoint VM | CrowdStrike blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | Microsoft Security blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Akamai blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 1179 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Cloudflare WAF managed-ruleset changelog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 136 newest items |
| Cloud / container | Wiz blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 714 newest items |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-26008 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-47575 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2025-61624 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| IDS / research | Cisco Talos blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 5 Suricata rules: sid 2057690, 2057691, 2057692, 2057693, 2057694 |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| Detection content | Elastic detection rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Elastic Security Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 102 newest items |
| Detection content | SigmaHQ rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Splunk ESCU | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| MSSP / IR firms | Arctic Wolf blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Huntress blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 746 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Rapid7 blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 20 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Sophos threat research | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| Research | Unit 42 | published — Unit 42 Uncovers PEERSTITCH, a Stealthy FortiGate Implant |
Checked automatically 2026-11-01 13:47Z from public sources: 18 published, 27 nothing found, 0 not machine-checkable, 0 failed. "Nothing found" means the public source answered and had nothing, as of that moment; a feed covers only its newest posts. Re-checked daily.
What a person would still look up (5)
| Vulnerability scanner | Look up whether your scanner has checks for CVE-2025-61624 and CVE-2024-47575 across FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, FortiSwitchManager and FortiManager versions. |
| SIEM / log pipeline | Confirm FortiOS system event, CLI audit, VPN and FortiManager device logs are collected, and that a syslog-silence alert exists per device. |
| NGFW / IPS | Check vendor documentation for signatures covering CVE-2024-47575 FGFM exploitation and CVE-2025-61624. |
| Threat intel platform | Confirm the four IPs, 8084/8085 URLs and nine SHA-256 hashes from Unit 42 are loaded and matched against egress logs. |
| Memory / file forensics | Check whether your forensic tooling can run the Unit 42 YARA rule against FortiGate files or memory captures with vendor support. |
Exposure queries — generated automatically
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-47575
vuln:CVE-2024-47575
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-26008
vuln:CVE-2024-26008
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2025-61624
vuln:CVE-2025-61624
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager"
open · Every Fortimanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager). Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager
product:"Fortimanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 12 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud"
open · Every Fortimanager Cloud service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud). Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
product:"Fortimanager Cloud"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 12 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager Cloud")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiproxy
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy"
open · Every Fortiproxy service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy). Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
product:"Fortiproxy"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiproxy" matches 5 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiproxy")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager"
open · Every Fortiswitchmanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager). Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
product:"Fortiswitchmanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiswitchmanager" matches nothing on Shodan▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiswitchmanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortimanager
http.title:"FortiManager"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (console login page title); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
2,504services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortiproxy
http.title:"FortiProxy"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (web admin console page title); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
770services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
Internet-wide count, trend
| Query | First | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
vuln:CVE-2024-26008 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2024-47575 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2025-61624 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager Cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
Shodan's count of matching services on the whole internet, one point a day; the scope (your ranges) is never part of it. A count moves with Shodan's crawl as much as with patching, so read the direction, not the digit.
NVD names 2 more affected products (libraries and embedders); the CVE query covers them where Shodan has fingerprinted the version.
Banner spellings: a model read 5 from the NVD names and this card's text (former and marketing names, console titles); 2 matched something on Shodan and are shown above, the rest were dropped.
Scope every query in your own tool, never in a shared document: Shodan `net:<your_ranges>`, `org:"<your_org>"` or `hostname:<your_domain>` (or a Shodan Monitor network alert, which applies the scope for you); Censys `host.ip: <your_ranges>` or `host.dns.names: <your_domain>`. Then compare the banner version with the affected range. Generated automatically 2026-11-01 13:47Z from the CVE ids and NVD's CPE configurations, each Shodan query counted against Shodan itself; re-built daily with the coverage check.
Open questions
- Which fixed versions does FG-IR-26-122 list? The provided material does not state them.
- What is the role of CVE-2024-26008 and CVE-2024-26009? Sources disagree or are silent.
- Does PEERSTITCH persist across reboot or firmware upgrade?
- Story dates are inconsistent: the item marked today is dated 2026-10-15 (the brief date), while other items are dated 2026-10-16 to 2026-10-20 and KEV listing is 2026-10-16. The timeline uses the dates as given.
- One published guidance item references NGFW signatures for CVE-2024-47575 with no traceable source; it is omitted.
- SecurityWeek's linked page returned unrelated content, so its reporting is uncorroborated [S2].
Sources
- [S1] https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/fortimanager-cve-2024-47575-peerstitch-malware/ · Unit 42
- [S2] https://www.securityweek.com/exploited-fortinet-bug-linked-to-stealthy-fortigate-implant-in-telecom-hack/ · SecurityWeek
- [S3] https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S4] https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2026/10/16/cisa-adds-two-known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S5] https://thehackernews.com/2026/10/attackers-exploit-fortios-flaw-to.html · The Hacker News
- [S6] https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-122 · FortiGuard Labs
Public OSINT only. AI-generated by the pipeline; structure follows the DAIR model from Dynamic Incident Response (Joshua Wright). Published automatically once it crosses the publish bar.