/cards/ once it crosses the publish bar. Status: superseded. Supersedes version 17.CL-STA-0954 chained FortiJump and KEV-listed CVE-2025-61624 to plant PEERSTITCH on FortiGates
Unit 42 reports that CL-STA-0954 (UNC5820) breached a telecom MSP's FortiManager via CVE-2024-47575, took configs and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates, then used CVE-2025-61624 to deploy PEERSTITCH into miglogd and iked [S1][S5]. CISA lists CVE-2025-61624 as exploited [S3][S4]. Today: capture evidence before rebooting, run the four hunts, rotate secrets held in device configs, and apply FG-IR-26-122 or its virtual patch [S6].
Triage: CVE-2025-61624 is KEV-listed as exploited [S3][S4], and one FortiManager compromise exposed configs and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates [S1].
Unit 42 primary research describes the intrusion [S1]. CISA confirms exploitation of CVE-2025-61624 [S3][S4]. Fortinet's advisory covers the fix [S6]. The SecurityWeek report could not be read [S2], and fixed versions are not in the provided material.
Changed since version 17
- Source references renumbered to this brief's list: Unit 42 is now S1 (the prior cited it as S6 without listing it), SecurityWeek S2, CISA KEV S3, CISA alert S4, The Hacker News S5, FortiGuard S6.
- Technical claims previously cited to The Hacker News now cite Unit 42 directly where its text confirms them [S1].
- Verify: added Unit 42 YARA rule u42_apt_linux_PEERSTITCH_fortigate_implant [S1].
- Verify: added a note that the brief's seven SHA-256 hashes need source confirmation, and a benign look-alike line.
- Eradicate and re-enter sections filled from Unit 42 and FortiGuard [S1][S6].
- Timeline added, including the 2026-10-20 SecurityWeek report that the pipeline could not read [S2].
- Open questions added: brief date inconsistency, unsourced Palo Alto signature IDs, unattributed hashes.
What happened
- The actor exploited FortiJump (CVE-2024-47575) on a telecom MSP's FortiManager and registered a rogue Virtual FortiGate named localhost (serial FMG-VMTM23017412) [S1].
- It generated a .tm config archive and took configs, credentials and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates. It also pushed unauthorized sniffer configs to downstream FortiGates [S1][S5].
- With cracked credentials it opened SSL-VPN sessions from external staging infrastructure [S1].
- It abused CVE-2025-61624 through auto-script objects named ../../../../setup to gain root and drop PEERSTITCH, which ptrace-injects into /bin/miglogd and /bin/iked [S1]. CISA added CVE-2025-61624 to KEV on 2026-10-16 [S4].
- It used Apache mod_md (MDChallengeDns01 mapped to /bin/node) to spawn SSH reverse shells [S1].
- It killed miglogd and syslogd, cleared crash logs, and deleted rogue admins, VPN groups and auto-scripts after use [S1].
Timeline
| 2024-10-23 | CVE-2024-47575 (FortiJump) listed in CISA KEV S3 |
| 2026-10-15 | Unit 42 publishes the PEERSTITCH analysis S1 |
| 2026-10-16 | CISA adds CVE-2025-61624 to KEV; The Hacker News reports the campaign S4 |
| 2026-10-19 | Federal KEV due date for CVE-2025-61624 S3 |
| 2026-10-20 | SecurityWeek reports; the pipeline could not read the page S2 |
Detect
FortiGate auto-script objects with path traversal names · FortiOS system event / config change logs (syslog or FortiAnalyzer forward)
index=* devid=* type="event" subtype="system" (cfgpath="system.auto-script" OR msg="*auto-script*") (cfgobj="*../*" OR msg="*../*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(action) as action values(cfgobj) as cfgobj values(msg) as msg by devname user ui
A hit means: An auto-script object with ../ in its name was created, edited or deleted. Unit 42 names ../../../../setup and ../../tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf [S1]. Treat a hit as likely compromise. The actor deletes auto-scripts after use, so a delete event alone matters [S1].
Traffic, web or SSL-VPN sessions involving campaign infrastructure · FortiGate traffic, web filter and VPN event logs; proxy/egress logs
index=* (srcip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR dstip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR remip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR url="*/pM.js" OR (dstport=8085 (url="*/a.js" OR url="*/a.wasm" OR url="*/b.js" OR url="*/dd")) OR (dstport=8084 (url="*/acme/*" OR url="*/directory")) OR url="*/acme/new-acct*" OR url="*/acme/finalize/*" OR url="*/acme/order/*" OR url="*/acme/authz/*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(dstport) as dstport values(url) as url values(action) as action values(user) as user by devname srcip dstipA hit means: A device contacted campaign infrastructure. A pM.js, a.js, a.wasm, b.js or dd fetch from 23.240.77.233:8085 matches the component download into /data2/template/ [S1]. Port 8084 /directory and /acme/ paths match the mod_md SSH reverse-shell channel [S1]. Inbound SSL-VPN logins from these IPs match stolen-credential use [S1]. ACME paths alone can be benign if the peer is not a campaign IP.
Logging daemons killed, crashlogs cleared, or FortiGateCloud admin activity · FortiOS CLI audit and system event logs
index=* devid=* (msg="*killall*miglogd*" OR msg="*killall*syslogd*" OR msg="*crashlog clear*" OR user="FortiGateCloud") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg values(ui) as ui by devname user
A hit means: Someone stopped logging or cleared crash logs, matching the actor's killall -9 miglogd/syslogd and crashlog clear [S1]. An admin named FortiGateCloud pulling running configs over FGFM matches the actor [S1]. Also check each device's syslog stream for gaps. A successful kill produces silence, not events.
Rogue Virtual FortiGate registration on FortiManager · FortiManager event / device management logs
index=* ("FMG-VMTM23017412" OR ("Virtual FortiGate" AND "localhost") OR ".tm") devid=* | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg by devnameA hit means: The rogue Virtual FortiGate serial or name appears, or a .tm archive is referenced [S1]. Treat the FortiManager and every device it manages as in scope. Absence does not clear you, since the actor may use other serials. The bare .tm term is noisy, so confirm by context.
Verify
- Pull config revisions on each FortiGate. Look for auto-script objects containing ../ and for admins or VPN groups that were created then deleted [S1].
- Run diagnose debug crashlog read. Signal 11 crashes in miglogd, iked or syslogd are a reported indicator [S1].
- pM.js deletes itself, so its absence does not clear a device [S5]. Check /data2/template/ for leftover components such as lldprx, ipssem.js and index.wasm [S1].
- Scan recovered files and memory images with Unit 42's YARA rule u42_apt_linux_PEERSTITCH_fortigate_implant. Its strings include /bin/miglogd, /bin/iked, 169.254.0.1, /tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf and /proc/%d/mem [S1].
- Review SSL-VPN sessions that authenticated without the expected validation steps. Hooked iked lets tagged sessions bypass validation [S1].
- Check the Apache mod_md job.json for MDChallengeDns01 mapped to /bin/node, or entries like kali@23.240.77.233:8084 with -F /tmp/upfile/ssh_config [S1].
Scope
Affected
- FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager (CVE-2025-61624) [S4][S6]
- FortiManager (CVE-2024-47575), the initial access in this campaign [S1]
- FortiGates managed by a compromised FortiManager, whose configs and keys were exfiltrated [S1]
Only if
- CVE-2025-61624 requires an authenticated attacker with an admin profile that has read-write permissions [S4].
- In this campaign, that access followed credentials and keys taken via the compromised FortiManager [S1].
Not affected if
None stated by the sources.
Fixed in: See Fortinet FG-IR-26-122 [S6]. Fixed versions are not stated in the provided material.
Enumerate
- Every FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, FortiSwitchManager and FortiManager instance, with its running version.
- For each FortiManager: all registered devices, unknown Virtual FortiGates, .tm archives, and the FortiGates it manages [S1].
- All admin accounts, VPN users and groups, including deleted ones visible in config revisions [S1].
- Sniffer configs on FortiGates, especially those capturing TCP 3696-3706, UDP 69, 1812/1813 or TCP 389 [S1].
- Secrets stored in FortiGate configs: admin and VPN credentials, pre-shared keys, certificates, RADIUS/LDAP binds.
- Management and FGFM (TCP 541) exposure per device, and the hosts each FortiGate accepts management connections from, since the actor used FGFM to pull configs [S1].
Contain
- Before patching or rebooting, export config revisions, event logs and crash logs. With vendor support, capture memory of miglogd and iked, where PEERSTITCH runs [S1]. A reboot destroys in-memory artifacts and cannot be undone.
- Block 23.240.77.233, 47.18.167.159, 45.32.41.202 and 198.199.122.22 at egress and for SSL-VPN [S1].
- Block outbound SSH from firewall management addresses unless it is required. The actor used mod_md to spawn SSH reverse shells [S1].
- Restrict management and FGFM access to known FortiManager and admin hosts. Remove internet exposure of FortiManager and admin interfaces.
- Disable unknown admins and VPN accounts. Remove unauthorized sniffer configs and rogue FortiManager device registrations [S1].
- If a FortiManager may be compromised, rotate every credential and key stored in FortiGate configs [S1]. Rotation does not undo exposure of data already taken.
- Apply FG-IR-26-122 and the FortiManager fix for CVE-2024-47575. Where patching lags, confirm FortiGuard virtual patch FG-VD-59270.0day (FMWP db 25.120) is in place [S6].
Eradicate
- Remove auto-script objects with traversal names and the files they dropped under /data2/template/ [S1].
- Remove the mod_md config abuse: MDChallengeDns01 mapped to /bin/node and /tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf [S1].
- Clear PEERSTITCH from miglogd and iked memory only after evidence capture, then reflash or upgrade to fixed firmware with vendor guidance [S1][S6].
- Remove the rogue Virtual FortiGate registration and close the FortiJump root cause on FortiManager [S1].
Recover
- Before restoring, confirm patched firmware, a config matching a known-good baseline, and rotated secrets [S6].
- Confirm syslog flows continuously from each device and crash logs are retained [S1].
- Confirm no 16KB rwxp regions remain in miglogd and iked, and the YARA rule finds nothing [S1].
- Afterwards, keep the four hunts running. Alert on new auto-scripts, short-lived admins, sniffer config changes, outbound SSH from firewalls, unexpected FGFM peers and logging gaps [S1].
Re-enter the loop when
- Fortinet updates FG-IR-26-122 with fixed versions, new affected products or new indicators [S6].
- Unit 42 or another primary source publishes new infrastructure, hashes or traversal object names [S1].
- A hunt hit appears on a FortiManager, which puts every managed FortiGate in scope [S1].
- CISA adds CVE-2024-26008 or CVE-2024-26009 to KEV [S3].
- The SecurityWeek report becomes readable and adds facts not in Unit 42 [S2].
Debrief
- Record each device, version, patch date, evidence captured and hunt results.
- Record which secrets were rotated and when, and any logging gaps found.
- Record VPN sessions that could not be validated, given the iked bypass [S1].
- Gap: the provided material does not state fixed versions.
- Gap: the sources do not explain the roles of CVE-2024-26008 and CVE-2024-26009. One summary calls CVE-2024-26008 a FortiJump alias, but the pipeline could not read that source [S2].
- Gap: the sources do not say whether PEERSTITCH survives a reboot.
Detection coverage — checked automatically
| Category | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Impacted vendor / CERT advisory | published — primary source among the thread's sources: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — not in the catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-47575 | published — listed 2024-10-23, federal due 2024-11-13 |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2025-61624 | published — listed 2026-10-16, federal due 2026-10-19 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-26008 | published — published 2025-10-14, CVSS 3.1 5.3 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-47575 | published — published 2024-10-23, CVSS 3.1 9.8 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2025-61624 | published — published 2026-04-14, CVSS 3.1 6 |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-47575 | published — ThreatPROTECT: CISA Added Fortinet FortiManager Vulnerability to its Known Exploitable Vulnerabilities Catalog (CVE-2024-47575) |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-26008 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-47575 | published — InsightVM coverage stated · 1 Metasploit module (not linked) |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2025-61624 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-26008 | published — 1 plugin: 270402 Fortinet Fortigate FGFM protocol allows unauthenticated reset of the connection (FG-IR-24-041) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 1 plugin: 209559 Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication (FG-IR-24-423) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2025-61624 | check failed — The operation was aborted due to timeout |
| EDR / endpoint VM | CrowdStrike blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | Microsoft Security blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Akamai blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 1179 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Cloudflare WAF managed-ruleset changelog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 136 newest items |
| Cloud / container | Wiz blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 714 newest items |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-26008 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-47575 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2025-61624 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| IDS / research | Cisco Talos blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 5 Suricata rules: sid 2057690, 2057691, 2057692, 2057693, 2057694 |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| Detection content | Elastic detection rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Elastic Security Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 102 newest items |
| Detection content | SigmaHQ rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Splunk ESCU | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| MSSP / IR firms | Arctic Wolf blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Huntress blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 746 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Rapid7 blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 20 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Sophos threat research | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| Research | Unit 42 | published — Unit 42 Uncovers PEERSTITCH, a Stealthy FortiGate Implant |
Checked automatically 2026-11-01 07:59Z from public sources: 17 published, 27 nothing found, 0 not machine-checkable, 1 failed. "Nothing found" means the public source answered and had nothing, as of that moment; a feed covers only its newest posts. Re-checked daily.
What a person would still look up (5)
| NGFW / IPS | Whether your vendor has signatures for CVE-2024-47575 and CVE-2025-61624 exploitation, and whether they are enabled on traffic to FortiManager and FortiGate management interfaces. |
| Vulnerability scanners | Whether checks exist for CVE-2025-61624 across FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager, and for CVE-2024-47575 on FortiManager. |
| Memory / file forensics | Whether your tooling can run the Unit 42 YARA rule against FortiGate memory or file images, given appliances usually lack an agent. |
| SIEM / log pipeline | Whether FortiOS config change, CLI audit and VPN logs reach the SIEM with the field names used in the hunts, and whether a per-device log-silence alert exists. |
| Threat intel / blocklists | Whether the four campaign IPs and the SHA-256 hashes are loaded and where they are enforced. |
Exposure queries — generated automatically
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-47575
vuln:CVE-2024-47575
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-26008
vuln:CVE-2024-26008
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2025-61624
vuln:CVE-2025-61624
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager"
open · Every Fortimanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager). Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager
product:"Fortimanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 12 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud"
open · Every Fortimanager Cloud service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud). Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
product:"Fortimanager Cloud"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 12 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager Cloud")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiproxy
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy"
open · Every Fortiproxy service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy). Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.4.12; >= 7.6.0 < 7.6.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
product:"Fortiproxy"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.4.12; >= 7.6.0 < 7.6.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiproxy" matches 5 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiproxy")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.4.12; >= 7.6.0 < 7.6.5.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager"
open · Every Fortiswitchmanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager). Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.7; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
product:"Fortiswitchmanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.7; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiswitchmanager" matches nothing on Shodan▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiswitchmanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.7; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8.
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortimanager
http.title:"FortiManager"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (console login page title on the management web UI); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
2,496services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortiproxy
http.title:"FortiProxy"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (web admin login page title); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
756services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
Internet-wide count, trend
| Query | First | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
vuln:CVE-2024-26008 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2024-47575 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2025-61624 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager Cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
Shodan's count of matching services on the whole internet, one point a day; the scope (your ranges) is never part of it. A count moves with Shodan's crawl as much as with patching, so read the direction, not the digit.
NVD names 2 more affected products (libraries and embedders); the CVE query covers them where Shodan has fingerprinted the version.
Banner spellings: a model read 4 from the NVD names and this card's text (former and marketing names, console titles); 2 matched something on Shodan and are shown above, the rest were dropped.
Scope every query in your own tool, never in a shared document: Shodan `net:<your_ranges>`, `org:"<your_org>"` or `hostname:<your_domain>` (or a Shodan Monitor network alert, which applies the scope for you); Censys `host.ip: <your_ranges>` or `host.dns.names: <your_domain>`. Then compare the banner version with the affected range. Generated automatically 2026-11-01 07:59Z from the CVE ids and NVD's CPE configurations, each Shodan query counted against Shodan itself; re-built daily with the coverage check.
Open questions
- Date inconsistency: the brief is dated 2026-10-15 and marks that story as today, yet other stories are dated 2026-10-16 to 2026-10-20 and the KEV addition is 2026-10-16. Confirm the thread order and brief date.
- Published guidance lists Palo Alto Threat Prevention signatures 95788 and 96788 for CVE-2024-47575 with no source; not used in the card.
- The source of the seven SHA-256 hashes and the 'index.js' component in the evidence samples is not attributed; confirm against Unit 42.
- Fixed versions for CVE-2025-61624 across the four products.
- Whether PEERSTITCH persists across reboot or firmware upgrade.
- Roles of CVE-2024-26008 and CVE-2024-26009 in the chain.
Sources
- [S1] https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/fortimanager-cve-2024-47575-peerstitch-malware/ · Unit 42
- [S2] https://www.securityweek.com/exploited-fortinet-bug-linked-to-stealthy-fortigate-implant-in-telecom-hack/ · SecurityWeek
- [S3] https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S4] https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2026/10/16/cisa-adds-two-known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S5] https://thehackernews.com/2026/10/attackers-exploit-fortios-flaw-to.html · The Hacker News
- [S6] https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-122 · FortiGuard Labs
Public OSINT only. AI-generated by the pipeline; structure follows the DAIR model from Dynamic Incident Response (Joshua Wright). Published automatically once it crosses the publish bar.