/cards/ once it crosses the publish bar. Status: superseded. Supersedes version 9.CL-STA-0954 chained FortiManager CVE-2024-47575 and KEV-listed CVE-2025-61624 to plant PEERSTITCH
Unit 42 reports that CL-STA-0954 (UNC5820) breached a telecom MSP's FortiManager, took configs and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates, then used CVE-2025-61624 to deploy PEERSTITCH, an in-memory injector that patches miglogd and iked. CISA lists CVE-2025-61624 as exploited. Today: capture evidence before rebooting, hunt auto-scripts, log-kill activity and campaign IPs, rotate secrets held in device configs, and apply FG-IR-26-122 or its virtual patch.
Triage: CVE-2025-61624 is KEV-listed as exploited [S3][S4], and one FortiManager compromise exposed credentials and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates [S1].
Unit 42 [S1] is the primary research source for the campaign, and CISA [S3][S4] confirms CVE-2025-61624 is exploited. CISA does not itself tie the CVE to this campaign. The SecurityWeek story [S2] reports its linked page returned unrelated content, so it adds no corroboration.
Changed since version 9
- Renumbered sources to this thread. Unit 42 is now S1 and listed as a source. SecurityWeek is S2, CISA KEV S3, the CISA alert S4, The Hacker News S5 and FortiGuard S6. Citations were re-attributed to Unit 42 where its text is quoted [S1].
- Hunt 2: added port 8084 /directory and /acme/ URLs, and 47.18.167.159:8085/pM.js [S1].
- Verify: added lldprx, ipssem.js, index.wasm and /data2/template/ artifacts, the mod_md job.json SSH config, the Unit 42 YARA rule and SHA-256 hashes, and benign look-alikes [S1].
- Eradicate: added the md-acme.conf auto-script, /data2/template/ files and the mod_md SSH config [S1].
- Confidence reason: noted that the SecurityWeek story's linked page returned unrelated content, so it adds no corroboration [S2].
- Timeline: added the Unit 42 publication, the KEV due date and SecurityWeek coverage [S1][S3][S2].
- Open questions: added the date inconsistency and the unsourced PAN signature IDs.
What happened
- CL-STA-0954 (UNC5820) exploited FortiJump (CVE-2024-47575) on a telecom MSP's FortiManager and registered a rogue Virtual FortiGate named localhost, serial FMG-VMTM23017412 [S1].
- The actor generated a .tm configuration archive and exfiltrated configs, credentials and keys for 500+ managed FortiGates. It also pushed unauthorized sniffer configs to downstream FortiGates [S1].
- Using stolen credentials, it opened SSL-VPN sessions from staging infrastructure. It then abused CVE-2025-61624 through auto-script objects with path traversal names such as ../../../../setup [S1][S5].
- The setup script downloaded five files from 23.240.77.233:8085 into /data2/template/. PEERSTITCH ptrace-injects into miglogd and iked so tagged VPN sessions bypass validation [S1].
- Apache mod_md was abused, with MDChallengeDns01 mapped to /bin/node, to open an SSH reverse shell. The actor killed logging daemons, cleared crashlogs, and deleted rogue admins, VPN groups and auto-scripts after use [S1].
- CISA added CVE-2025-61624 to KEV on 2026-10-16. The bug lets an authenticated read-write admin write or delete arbitrary files via CLI commands [S4].
Timeline
| 2024-10-23 | CVE-2024-47575 (FortiJump) added to CISA KEV S3 |
| 2026-10-15 | Unit 42 publishes PEERSTITCH research on CL-STA-0954 S1 |
| 2026-10-16 | CISA adds CVE-2025-61624 to KEV based on evidence of active exploitation S4 |
| 2026-10-19 | Federal KEV due date for CVE-2025-61624 S3 |
| 2026-10-20 | SecurityWeek covers the campaign S2 |
Detect
FortiGate auto-script objects with path traversal names · FortiOS system event / config change logs (syslog or FortiAnalyzer forward)
index=* devid=* type="event" subtype="system" (cfgpath="system.auto-script" OR msg="*auto-script*") (cfgobj="*../*" OR msg="*../*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(action) as action values(cfgobj) as cfgobj values(msg) as msg by devname user ui
A hit means: An auto-script object with ../ in its name was created, edited or deleted. Unit 42 names ../../../../setup and ../../tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf [S1]. Treat a hit as likely compromise. The actor deletes these objects after use, so a delete event alone matters [S1].
Traffic, web or SSL-VPN sessions involving campaign infrastructure · FortiGate traffic, web filter and VPN event logs; proxy/egress logs
index=* (srcip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR dstip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR remip IN ("23.240.77.233","47.18.167.159","45.32.41.202","198.199.122.22") OR url="*/pM.js" OR (dstport=8085 (url="*/a.js" OR url="*/a.wasm" OR url="*/b.js" OR url="*/dd")) OR (dstport=8084 (url="*/acme/*" OR url="*/directory")) OR url="*/acme/new-acct*" OR url="*/acme/finalize/*" OR url="*/acme/order/*" OR url="*/acme/authz/*") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(dstport) as dstport values(url) as url values(action) as action values(user) as user by devname srcip dstipA hit means: A device contacted campaign infrastructure. Fetches on port 8085 match the component download from 23.240.77.233 or 47.18.167.159 [S1]. Port 8084 /directory and /acme/ paths match the mod_md SSH reverse-shell channel [S1]. Inbound SSL-VPN logins from these IPs match stolen-credential use [S1]. ACME paths alone can be benign if the peer is not a campaign IP.
Logging daemons killed, crashlogs cleared, or FortiGateCloud admin activity · FortiOS CLI audit and system event logs
index=* devid=* (msg="*killall*miglogd*" OR msg="*killall*syslogd*" OR msg="*crashlog clear*" OR user="FortiGateCloud") | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg values(ui) as ui by devname user
A hit means: Someone ran killall -9 on miglogd or syslogd, or cleared crashlogs. Unit 42 reports all three as actor tradecraft. It also reports an admin named FortiGateCloud downloading running configs over FGFM [S1]. Check each device's syslog stream for gaps as well. A successful kill produces silence, not events.
Rogue Virtual FortiGate registration on FortiManager · FortiManager event / device management logs
index=* ("FMG-VMTM23017412" OR ("Virtual FortiGate" AND "localhost") OR ".tm") devid=* | stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(msg) as msg by devnameA hit means: The rogue Virtual FortiGate serial or name appears, or a .tm archive is referenced [S1]. Treat the FortiManager and every device it manages as in scope. Absence does not clear you; the actor may use other serials.
Verify
- Pull config revisions on each FortiGate. Look for auto-script objects containing ../, and for admins or VPN groups that were created then deleted [S1].
- pM.js deletes itself, so its absence on disk does not clear a device [S5].
- Look for unexpected sniffer configs targeting TCP 3696-3706, UDP 69, UDP 1812/1813 or TCP 389 [S1].
- Run 'diagnose debug crashlog read' and look for Signal 11 crashes in miglogd, iked or syslogd [S1].
- With vendor support, inspect /proc/<pid>/maps of miglogd and iked for anonymous 16,384-byte rwxp regions. Audit open/write on /proc/<pid>/mem between them [S1].
- With vendor support, check text at base+0x106F7B8, 0x1072E20 and 0x109A570 for NOP patches (0xAA0003E0) [S1].
Scope
Affected
- FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager (CVE-2025-61624) [S4][S6]
- FortiManager (CVE-2024-47575), the initial access in this campaign [S1]
- FortiGates managed by a compromised FortiManager, whose configs and keys were exfiltrated [S1]
Only if
- CVE-2025-61624: the attacker is authenticated with an admin profile that has read-write permissions [S4]
- In this campaign, that access came from credentials taken via the compromised FortiManager [S1]
Not affected if
None stated by the sources.
Fixed in: See Fortinet FG-IR-26-122 [S6]. Fixed versions are not stated in the provided material.
Enumerate
- Every FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, FortiSwitchManager and FortiManager instance, with its running version.
- For each FortiManager: all registered devices, any unknown Virtual FortiGates, .tm archives, and which FortiGates it manages.
- All admin accounts, VPN users and groups, including deleted ones visible in config revisions.
- Secrets stored in FortiGate configs: admin and VPN credentials, pre-shared keys, certificates, RADIUS/LDAP binds.
- Management and FGFM (TCP 541) exposure per device, and which hosts each FortiGate accepts management connections from.
- VPN sessions on each FortiGate since first suspected access, compared against expected users and sources.
Contain
- Before patching or rebooting, export config revisions, event logs and crashlogs. With vendor support, capture memory of miglogd and iked. PEERSTITCH lives in process memory [S1]. A reboot destroys those artifacts and cannot be undone.
- Block 23.240.77.233, 47.18.167.159, 45.32.41.202 and 198.199.122.22 at egress and for SSL-VPN [S1].
- Block outbound SSH from firewall management addresses unless required. The actor used mod_md to spawn SSH reverse shells [S1].
- Restrict management and FGFM access to known FortiManager and admin hosts, since the actor impersonated FortiManager [S5]. Remove internet exposure of FortiManager and admin interfaces.
- Disable unknown admins and VPN accounts. Remove unauthorized sniffer configs and rogue FortiManager device registrations [S1].
- If a FortiManager may be compromised, rotate every credential and key stored in FortiGate configs [S1]. Data already taken stays exposed after rotation.
- Apply FG-IR-26-122 [S6] and the FortiManager fix for CVE-2024-47575. Where patching lags, confirm FortiGuard virtual patch FG-VD-59270.0day (FMWP db 25.120) is in place [S6].
Eradicate
- Remove traversal-named auto-script objects, including ../../../../setup and ../../tmp/apache2/conf/md-acme.conf [S1].
- Remove files under /data2/template/ and the mod_md job.json SSH config pointing to 23.240.77.233:8084, with vendor support [S1].
- Clear injected code in miglogd and iked with vendor support. Whether a restart alone suffices is not stated.
- Remove rogue Virtual FortiGate registrations and .tm archives from FortiManager [S1].
- Close the root cause: patch CVE-2024-47575 and CVE-2025-61624, and invalidate all stolen credentials and keys [S1][S6].
Recover
- Before restoring, confirm patched firmware, a config matching a known-good baseline, and rotated secrets [S6].
- Confirm syslog flows continuously from each device and crashlogs are retained.
- Afterwards, keep the four hunts running [S1]. Alert on:
- New auto-scripts, short-lived admins and sniffer config changes.
- Outbound SSH from firewalls and unexpected FGFM peers.
- Unexpected VPN sessions and logging gaps.
Re-enter the loop when
- Fortinet updates FG-IR-26-122 with fixed versions, new affected products or workarounds.
- New IoCs, hashes or staging IPs are published for CL-STA-0954 / PEERSTITCH.
- Evidence emerges that PEERSTITCH persists across reboot or firmware upgrade.
- A hunt hits on any FortiGate or FortiManager, or a logging gap is found on a device.
- CISA or Fortinet ties CVE-2024-26008 or CVE-2024-26009 to exploitation in this campaign.
Debrief
- Record each device, version, patch date, evidence captured, and hunt results.
- Record which secrets were rotated and when, and any logging gaps found.
- Record VPN sessions that could not be validated, given the iked bypass [S1].
- Gap: no fixed versions in the provided material.
- Gap: the roles of CVE-2024-26008 and CVE-2024-26009 are not explained. One story calls CVE-2024-26008 an alias of FortiJump, which the sources do not support [S2].
- Gap: whether PEERSTITCH survives a reboot is not stated.
Detection coverage — checked automatically
| Category | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Impacted vendor / CERT advisory | published — primary source among the thread's sources: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — not in the catalog |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2024-47575 | published — listed 2024-10-23, federal due 2024-11-13 |
| Government | CISA KEV · CVE-2025-61624 | published — listed 2026-10-16, federal due 2026-10-19 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-26008 | published — published 2025-10-14, CVSS 3.1 5.3 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2024-47575 | published — published 2024-10-23, CVSS 3.1 9.8 |
| Reference | NVD · CVE-2025-61624 | published — published 2026-04-14, CVSS 3.1 6 |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2024-47575 | published — ThreatPROTECT: CISA Added Fortinet FortiManager Vulnerability to its Known Exploitable Vulnerabilities Catalog (CVE-2024-47575) |
| VM scanners | Qualys · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no ThreatPROTECT or Security Blog post names it; the QID knowledge base needs a login |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-26008 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2024-47575 | published — InsightVM coverage stated · 1 Metasploit module (not linked) |
| VM scanners | Rapid7 · CVE-2025-61624 | published — InsightVM coverage stated |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-26008 | published — 1 plugin: 270402 Fortinet Fortigate FGFM protocol allows unauthenticated reset of the connection (FG-IR-24-041) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 1 plugin: 209559 Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication (FG-IR-24-423) |
| VM scanners | Tenable · CVE-2025-61624 | published — 1 plugin: 306463 Fortinet Fortigate Path Traversal in CLI (FG-IR-26-122) |
| EDR / endpoint VM | CrowdStrike blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | Microsoft Security blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| EDR / endpoint VM | SentinelOne Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Akamai blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 1179 newest items |
| WAF / edge | Cloudflare WAF managed-ruleset changelog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 136 newest items |
| Cloud / container | Wiz blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 714 newest items |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-26008 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2024-47575 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Debian tracker · CVE-2025-61624 | published — tracker entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| Linux distro errata | Red Hat · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no Red Hat entry |
| IDS / research | Cisco Talos blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2024-47575 | published — 5 Suricata rules: sid 2057690, 2057691, 2057692, 2057693, 2057694 |
| IDS / research | Emerging Threats open · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no open rule names it (exploit, web_server, web_specific_apps sets) |
| Detection content | Elastic detection rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Elastic Security Labs | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 102 newest items |
| Detection content | SigmaHQ rules | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Detection content | Splunk ESCU | nothing found — no rule file names PEERSTITCH / CVE-2024-47575 / CVE-2024-26008 |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-26008 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2024-47575 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| Community | Nuclei template · CVE-2025-61624 | nothing found — no template under http/cves |
| MSSP / IR firms | Arctic Wolf blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 10 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Huntress blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 746 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Rapid7 blog | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 20 newest items |
| MSSP / IR firms | Sophos threat research | nothing found — no post names it among the feed's 15 newest items |
| Research | Unit 42 | published — Unit 42 Uncovers PEERSTITCH, a Stealthy FortiGate Implant |
Checked automatically 2026-11-01 02:41Z from public sources: 18 published, 27 nothing found, 0 not machine-checkable, 0 failed. "Nothing found" means the public source answered and had nothing, as of that moment; a feed covers only its newest posts. Re-checked daily.
What a person would still look up (5)
| VM scanners | Check whether authenticated version checks exist for CVE-2025-61624 on FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager, and for CVE-2024-47575 on FortiManager. |
| NGFW / IPS | Check whether signatures exist for FortiJump (CVE-2024-47575) exploitation over FGFM TCP 541, and whether they are enabled in front of FortiManager. |
| SIEM | Confirm FortiGate and FortiManager logs are parsed into devid, cfgpath, cfgobj, msg, user and remip fields, and that per-device syslog silence raises an alert. |
| Threat intel platform | Check that the campaign IPs, URLs and SHA-256 hashes from Unit 42 are ingested and matched against egress and VPN logs. |
| Memory / file forensics | Check whether your tooling or vendor support can image FortiOS process memory and run the Unit 42 YARA rule. |
Exposure queries — generated automatically
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-47575
vuln:CVE-2024-47575
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2024-26008
vuln:CVE-2024-26008
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cve · CVE-2025-61624
vuln:CVE-2025-61624
open · Shodan tags a service with a CVE from its banner version; a paid-tier filter. Exact for this CVE, blind to a host Shodan has not fingerprinted.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — Shodan has tagged no banner with this CVE yet; its tagging follows its own version fingerprinting, not the advisory▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager"
open · Every Fortimanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager). Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager
product:"Fortimanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 13 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13; >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15; >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5; = 7.6.0.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud"
open · Every Fortimanager Cloud service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud). Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
product:"Fortimanager Cloud"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortimanager" matches 13 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortimanager_cloud
host.services: (software.product = "Fortimanager Cloud")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 6.4.1 <= 6.4.7; >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13; >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8; >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiproxy
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy"
open · Every Fortiproxy service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy). Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
product:"Fortiproxy"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiproxy" matches 5 services, but no product or http.component facet value names this product; Shodan may not fingerprint it▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiproxy
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiproxy")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 1.2.0 < 7.2.10; >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.4.
shodan · cpe · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager"
open · Every Fortiswitchmanager service Shodan fingerprinted, any version (CPE 2.2 form of cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager). Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
shodan · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
product:"Fortiswitchmanager"
open · Banner product name, NVD's spelling; adjust if Shodan's differs. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
0match this spelling on Shodan · 2026-11-01 — a text search for "Fortiswitchmanager" matches nothing on Shodan▬ 0 on 2026-10-31 (+0)
censys · product · fortinet:fortiswitchmanager
host.services: (software.product = "Fortiswitchmanager")
Censys Platform host search, software as fingerprinted at layer 7. Affected per NVD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.4; >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.4.
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortimanager
http.title:"FortiManager"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (web admin console title on login page); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
2,486services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
shodan · alias · fortinet:fortiproxy
http.title:"FortiProxy"
open · Banner spelling suggested by the model from the card text (web admin console title on login page); counted against Shodan before it was shown.
749services internet-wide on Shodan · 2026-11-01
Internet-wide count, trend
| Query | First | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
vuln:CVE-2024-26008 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2024-47575 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
vuln:CVE-2025-61624 | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortimanager Cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
product:"Fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiproxy" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortimanager_cloud" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
cpe:"cpe:/a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager" | 0 2026-10-31 | 0 2026-11-01 | +0 over 2 days |
Shodan's count of matching services on the whole internet, one point a day; the scope (your ranges) is never part of it. A count moves with Shodan's crawl as much as with patching, so read the direction, not the digit.
NVD names 2 more affected products (libraries and embedders); the CVE query covers them where Shodan has fingerprinted the version.
Banner spellings: a model read 6 from the NVD names and this card's text (former and marketing names, console titles); 2 matched something on Shodan and are shown above, the rest were dropped.
Scope every query in your own tool, never in a shared document: Shodan `net:<your_ranges>`, `org:"<your_org>"` or `hostname:<your_domain>` (or a Shodan Monitor network alert, which applies the scope for you); Censys `host.ip: <your_ranges>` or `host.dns.names: <your_domain>`. Then compare the banner version with the affected range. Generated automatically 2026-11-01 02:41Z from the CVE ids and NVD's CPE configurations, each Shodan query counted against Shodan itself; re-built daily with the coverage check.
Open questions
- Date inconsistency: the brief is dated 2026-10-15 and that story is marked today, yet other stories are dated 2026-10-16 to 2026-10-20 and CISA's KEV addition is 2026-10-16. Which date is current?
- The SecurityWeek story [S2] says its only linked source returned unrelated content. Is S2 a valid source for this campaign?
- PAN Threat Prevention signatures 95788 and 96788 for CVE-2024-47575 appear in guidance with no source attached. These are unverified and are left out of the card.
- Does CVE-2024-26008 relate to FortiJump, as one story claims, or is it a separate issue?
- What are the fixed versions for CVE-2025-61624 per FG-IR-26-122?
Sources
- [S1] https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/fortimanager-cve-2024-47575-peerstitch-malware/ · Unit 42
- [S2] https://www.securityweek.com/exploited-fortinet-bug-linked-to-stealthy-fortigate-implant-in-telecom-hack/ · SecurityWeek
- [S3] https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S4] https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2026/10/16/cisa-adds-two-known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog · CISA
- [S5] https://thehackernews.com/2026/10/attackers-exploit-fortios-flaw-to.html · The Hacker News
- [S6] https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-122 · FortiGuard Labs
Public OSINT only. AI-generated by the pipeline; structure follows the DAIR model from Dynamic Incident Response (Joshua Wright). Published automatically once it crosses the publish bar.